Results corroborate the effectiveness of LLMs in improving and streamlining RE phases by analyzing the semantic similarity and API performance of different models, as well as their effectiveness and efficiency in requirements analysis.
Abstract
Requirements Engineering (RE) plays a pivotal role in software development, encompassing tasks such as requirements elicitation, analysis, specification, and change management. Despite its critical importance, RE faces challenges including communication complexities, early-stage uncertainties, and accurate resource estimation. This study empirically investigates the effectiveness of utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate requirements analysis tasks. We implemented a multi-agent system that deploys AI models as agents to generate user stories from initial requirements, assess and improve their quality, and prioritize them using a selected technique. In our implementation, we deployed four models, namely GPT-3.5, GPT-4 Omni, LLaMA3-70, and Mixtral-8B, and conducted experiments to analyze requirements on four real-world projects. We evaluated the results by analyzing the semantic similarity and API performance of different models, as well as their effectiveness and efficiency in requirements analysis, gathering users' feedback on their experiences. Preliminary results indicate notable variations in task completion among the models. Mixtral-8B provided the quickest responses, while GPT-3.5 performed exceptionally well when processing complex user stories with a higher similarity score, demonstrating its capability in deriving accurate user stories from project descriptions. Feedback and suggestions from the four project members further corroborate the effectiveness of LLMs in improving and streamlining RE phases.
A comprehensive overview of the existing tools and frameworks for implementing MAS in software engineering and a set of lessons learned and challenges that can help researchers and practitioners to select a suitable MAS framework according to their needs are provided.
Maria Sâmyla Serafim de Oliveira, M. Ibiyo, Marco Gianrusso et al.· 1 citation
SDD reconstitutes, in specification-centric form, the contracts that vibe coding dissolves: accountability, verifiability, and transferability, and outlines a research agenda for future empirical validation.
J. Díaz, J. Gayoso, Andrea Cimminio et al.· 2 citations
TestAgent is proposed, an LLM-based test generation approach that addresses the above limitations by emulating human testing practices via a multi-agent collaboration mechanism and equips TestAgent with a set of tool APIs that can be invoked dynamically in an on-demand and adaptive manner.
Quanjun Zhang, Ye Shang, Siqi Gu et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Examination of Agentic AI integration in SQA examines Agentic AI integration in SQA, analyzing application distribution, agent characteristics, and supported stakeholder roles to identify coverage, trends, benefits, limitations, and gaps.
A systematic literature review of technical approaches, including agent architecture, perception, memory, reasoning and planning, action space, orchestration, and self-improvement, reveals a field that has built agents able to act but not yet agents whose authority is bounded or whose behavior is auditable.
Jing-Jing Nie, Jiawei Guo, Krishna Meda et al.· 0 citations
Results suggest that explicit role coordination can support development cycle organization and architectural quality, but requires deliberate coordination strategies, context management, and human verification of agent-generated outputs.
C. Fernández-Y-Fernández, Jorge R. Aguilar-Cisneros· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 15, 2026
A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduJun 3, 2026
The new ChartNet training dataset could improve the accuracy of vision-language models that help analyze business trends or interpret scientific figures.