Skip to content

AI based Multiagent Approach for Requirements Elicitation and Analysis

Aug 2024 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2409.00038 · 17 citations · ⚡ 2 influential · 28 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Results corroborate the effectiveness of LLMs in improving and streamlining RE phases by analyzing the semantic similarity and API performance of different models, as well as their effectiveness and efficiency in requirements analysis.

Abstract

Requirements Engineering (RE) plays a pivotal role in software development, encompassing tasks such as requirements elicitation, analysis, specification, and change management. Despite its critical importance, RE faces challenges including communication complexities, early-stage uncertainties, and accurate resource estimation. This study empirically investigates the effectiveness of utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate requirements analysis tasks. We implemented a multi-agent system that deploys AI models as agents to generate user stories from initial requirements, assess and improve their quality, and prioritize them using a selected technique. In our implementation, we deployed four models, namely GPT-3.5, GPT-4 Omni, LLaMA3-70, and Mixtral-8B, and conducted experiments to analyze requirements on four real-world projects. We evaluated the results by analyzing the semantic similarity and API performance of different models, as well as their effectiveness and efficiency in requirements analysis, gathering users' feedback on their experiences. Preliminary results indicate notable variations in task completion among the models. Mixtral-8B provided the quickest responses, while GPT-3.5 performed exceptionally well when processing complex user stories with a higher similarity score, demonstrating its capability in deriving accurate user stories from project descriptions. Feedback and suggestions from the four project members further corroborate the effectiveness of LLMs in improving and streamlining RE phases.

View source

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

Developing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering: A Mixed-Method Experience Report

A comprehensive overview of the existing tools and frameworks for implementing MAS in software engineering and a set of lessons learned and challenges that can help researchers and practitioners to select a suitable MAS framework according to their needs are provided.

Maria Sâmyla Serafim de Oliveira, M. Ibiyo, Marco Gianrusso et al. · 1 citation
Review Jul 2026

Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration for Unit Test Generation via Human-Testing-Inspired Workflows

TestAgent is proposed, an LLM-based test generation approach that addresses the above limitations by emulating human testing practices via a multi-agent collaboration mechanism and equips TestAgent with a set of tool APIs that can be invoked dynamically in an on-demand and adaptive manner.

Quanjun Zhang, Ye Shang, Siqi Gu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Software quality assurance in the era of Agentic AI: a systematic mapping study

Examination of Agentic AI integration in SQA examines Agentic AI integration in SQA, analyzing application distribution, agent characteristics, and supported stakeholder roles to identify coverage, trends, benefits, limitations, and gaps.

Randa Ouaarous, Imane Hilal, Abdellatif Mezrioui · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Aug 2026

LLM-Based Agents for Software and Systems Security: Approaches, Applications, and Assessment

A systematic literature review of technical approaches, including agent architecture, perception, memory, reasoning and planning, action space, orchestration, and self-improvement, reveals a field that has built agents able to act but not yet agents whose authority is bounded or whose behavior is auditable.

Jing-Jing Nie, Jiawei Guo, Krishna Meda et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

The Role Specialization Model (RSM): Coordinating LLM-Based Tools in Agentic Software Development - An Exploratory Case Study

Results suggest that explicit role coordination can support development cycle organization and architectural quality, but requires deliberate coordination strategies, context management, and human verification of agent-generated outputs.

C. Fernández-Y-Fernández, Jorge R. Aguilar-Cisneros · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 15, 2026

AI model decodes the language cells use to communicate

A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Jun 3, 2026

MIT researchers teach AI models to interpret charts

The new ChartNet training dataset could improve the accuracy of vision-language models that help analyze business trends or interpret scientific figures.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.