Skip to content
Open access

Validation of Precision and Accuracy of Point-of-Care Testing Glucose Analyzers with a Standard Laboratory Method (Glucose Oxidase Method)

Aug 2026 · IOASD Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences · 0 citations

TL;DR

POCT glucose meters should be used cautiously and primarily for monitoring trends rather than definitive diagnosis or therapeutic decisions, as they have limited reliability for critical clinical decision-making.

Abstract

Accurate blood glucose measurement is essential for the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. This study evaluated the precision and accuracy of three point-of-care testing (POCT) glucose analyzers—Accu-Chek, Accu-ANSWER, and VivaChek—against the standard laboratory glucose oxidase method. A total of 97 participants were recruited, and venous blood samples were analyzed using both POCT devices and the reference method. Results demonstrated that all three POCT devices consistently overestimated blood glucose levels, exhibiting a systematic positive bias ranging from +18.56 mg/dL to +19.99 mg/dL. Bland–Altman analysis revealed wide limits of agreement and evidence of proportional bias, with inaccuracies increasing at higher glucose concentrations. Only 39.18% of measurements met the ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria (±15%), while over 40% deviated by more than 25%. Among the devices, VivaChek showed relatively better precision, whereas Accu-Chek demonstrated the widest variability and lowest agreement with the reference method. Despite their convenience and rapid turnaround time, the findings indicate that these POCT devices have limited reliability for critical clinical decision-making. The study concludes that POCT glucose meters should be used cautiously and primarily for monitoring trends rather than definitive diagnosis or therapeutic decisions.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Cross-sectional evaluation of two point-of-care glucose meters against the GOD-PAP reference method

Both POCT devices demonstrated acceptable analytical agreement with the GOD-PAP method for blood glucose testing, however, Emtech BG Max 1 exhibited superior precision, lower analytical bias, and higher compliance with ISO 15197:2013, indicating greater reliability for routine clinical use.

Muhammad Jalil Razak, N. Ismi, Marisca Jenice Sanakya et al. · 0 citations
2026

CORRELATION BETWEEN POINT-OF-CARE AND LABORATORY-BASED AUTOMATED BLOOD GLUCOSE TESTING

Background:Diabetes mellitus is a growing global health concern, with rising prevalence particularly in low-and middle-income countries. Accurate blood glucose estimation is essential for diagnosis, monitoring, and prevention of complications. While glucometers provide rapid, convenient results at the point ofcare, lab...

Vaaruni Sharma, Ajay K. Puri · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Evaluation of the accuracy of a portable glucose meter compared with laboratory-based spectrophotometric methods

The glucometer demonstrated moderate performance and partial agreement with selected ISO 15197:2015 accuracy limits compared with laboratory-based spectrophotometric methods, but increased variability at higher glucose concentrations limits its applicability in settings requiring high analytical precision.

Pablo Letelier, Guido Fierro, K. Cuminao et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Assessing the reliability and validity for metabolic syndrome diagnosis using point-of-care analyzers in a mobile setup - a pilot study

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by having three or more of these risk factors: increased blood glucose (Glc), serum triglycerides (TG), blood pressure (BP), waist circumference (WC), and reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Mobile diagnostics using point-of-care (POC) blood analyzers could help identi...

S. Houtenbos, A. Schraplau, P. Wippert et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.