Skip to content

Bridging Humans and LLMs: Investigating Human-AI Collaboration in Multi-agent Requirements Analysis for Organizational AI Adoption

2026 · e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal · Vol 20, pp. 260103 · 6 citations · 55 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

LLM-based multi-agent systems can support strategic AI planning by enabling iterative refinement with human experts by supporting structured and collaborative Requirements Engineering processes for AI adoption planning.

Abstract

Context: Organizations adopting Artificial Intelligence (AI) face challenges in eliciting and analyzing requirements that align with strategic objectives, especially when human oversight and iterative refinement are needed. Large Language Models (LLMs)-based Multi-agent systems provide a potential solution by supporting structured and collaborative Requirements Engineering (RE) processes for AI adoption planning. Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate whether a multi-agent system, built on LLMs and supported by human input, can assist in requirements analysis for AI adoption. Method: We used a mixed-method approach: (i) designed and developed a multi-agent system to support the generation and prioritization of requirements for AI adoption, (ii) conducted multiple case studies with four companies to evaluate the system, and (iii) collected data through post-session questionnaires from nine participants and follow-up interviews, one per company. Results: Questionnaire and interview findings together indicate that the system may assist in identifying relevant and goal-aligned requirements. Seven participants considered the generated requirements relevant, and six found them aligned with organizational goals. Participants noted that iterative feedback improved completeness and feasibility, often within two feedback rounds. Both data sources show that human input was essential to clarify technical details, ensure contextual accuracy, and validate prioritization results. Participants from all companies also identified usability, transparency, and scalability as areas requiring further refinement for broader organizational use. Conclusions: LLM-based multi-agent systems can support strategic AI planning by enabling iterative refinement with human experts. Future work will include more interviews with stakeholders and adjustments to system features to improve transparency, usability, and scalability.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Human–AI Teaming in Modern Organizations: A Framework for Collaborative Intelligence

The study argues that collaborative intelligence should be viewed as an organizational capability rather than merely a technological outcome, requiring deliberate management of human judgment, ethical responsibility, and organizational design.

M. R · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Human‐Centred AI Teammate Design: A Participatory Method for Eliciting Business Needs in Complex Problem‐Solving

Results from the proof‐of‐concept and proof‐of‐value evaluations provide initial evidence that the IATReBS method can help participants identify AI teammate requirements in complex problem‐solving contexts, particularly regarding feasibility, usability and perceived usefulness.

Wen-Qiang Li, J. Gou, L. Camarinha-Matos et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

From AI Assistants to AI Workforces: A Multi-Agent Enterprise Operating Model for Saudi Vision 2030 Organizations

The contribution is a reusable, governance-aware operating model for transitioning from task-level AI assistants to accountable, human-supervised, multi-agent AI workforces suitable for digitally mature Vision 2030 organizations.

Choudhry Bilal Mazhar Hussain · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Human-Ai Interface: Assessing The Role Of Explainable Ai (Xai) In Mitigating Knowledge Worker Resistance And Fostering Trust During Ai-Driven Business Process Automation

The study concludes that Explainable AI is not only a technological enhancement but also a strategic tool for promoting employee trust and supporting effective digital transformation and recommends that organizations prioritize explainability, invest in AI literacy and training, and develop transparent AI governance fr...

Evelyn Chichi Otuya, A. Ayegba · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Cognitive Readiness for Human-AI Collaboration.

Communication inflexibility, limited shared understanding, and trust miscalibration emerge as recurring barriers to HAT, while regulatory capacities represent particularly critical dimensions of HAT readiness that remain to be fully operationalized.

Sébastien Tremblay, Delphine De Hemptinne, Gabrielle Teyssier-Roberge et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Developing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering: A Mixed-Method Experience Report

A comprehensive overview of the existing tools and frameworks for implementing MAS in software engineering and a set of lessons learned and challenges that can help researchers and practitioners to select a suitable MAS framework according to their needs are provided.

Maria Sâmyla Serafim de Oliveira, M. Ibiyo, Marco Gianrusso et al. · 1 citation

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 15, 2026

AI model decodes the language cells use to communicate

A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Jun 3, 2026

MIT researchers teach AI models to interpret charts

The new ChartNet training dataset could improve the accuracy of vision-language models that help analyze business trends or interpret scientific figures.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.